AMS2 will be similar to PC2 which is similar to AC and they're all slightly better than rF2 when it comes to fps. I haven't seen many fps reports for ACC triple monitors and I've yet to buy the game (come on Black Friday!), but it is known for being the poorest performer and I expect my 1080 will not cut it. Going from a single monitor to triple monitors you will definitely see worse fps, in the range of 30%-50% worse. I find the relative performance chart at to be useful for estimating GPU performance when considering whether a GPU is going to be satisfactory.ġ070 is 85% fps of a 1080 -> okay for 60 Hz triples some settings turned downĢ060 is 100% fps of a 1080 -> okay for 75 Hz triples some settings turned downġ080ti is 127% of a 1080 -> good for 75 Hz triples settings full (or 60 Hz triples Super is 129% of a 1080 On some track/car combos, I'll be at 60fps for the first lap or two, while the cars are bunched up. My 1080p triples are being refreshed at 75 Hz and I've got settings turned down a bit, primarily in AA, to keep from dropping under 75 fps. I'd have been happier if I'd sprung for a 1080ti. You can certainly drive around with one car at 60 fps, but who really wants to limit themselves in that way? Works fine with rF1, but underpowered for anything more modern unless you're turning off shadows and use no AA (possibly a slight exaggeration, but you get the idea and its not far from the truth). I started my adventures with 1080p triples 4 years ago using a 970. You can always sell it off later when you can afford the rest of the triple monitor setup. Otherwise, if ya gotta buy a new monitor NOW to satisfy an itch, get a good large one and stay single screen. Piece-mealing a system will lead to dissatisfaction with triples. Personally, if want triples that badly, save your money until you can get three matching monitors and the video card that will drive them well. But you're likely only going to have 60 fps after turning down settings.
0 kommentar(er)
